On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 14:07 +0800, Mengdong Lin wrote: > > On 01/05/2017 05:47 AM, Liam Girdwood wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, Mengdong Lin wrote: > >> > >> On 01/04/2017 04:09 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > >> So we'll keep the manufacturer name. > >> > >> And let's put the "Product version" as well if available, Liam? > > > > Yes, lets keep the manufacturer name. I agree with Pierre in that we > > dont want meaningless directories names. > > Okay. Thanks for your confirmation! > > > Creating a directory structures > > like > > > > 1) manufacturer/product/board OR > > 2) manufacturer/product OR > > 3) manufacturer/board > > > > (2 or 3 if board or product is NULL) > > > > are fine by me and make finding the correct card simpler. You could even > > replace the . with / in your longname to save the string conversion > > later on. > > > > Liam > > May we keep the flat directory structure for UCM files? This may lead to really long file names and a very crowded master directory. > > For the same manufacturer, its DMI vendor name could change, e.g. "Intel > Inc." or "Intel Corporation". In addition, there may be changes caused > by using upper case or low case characters. Since we don't want to > maintain a mapping table and just do verbatim copy of DMI info, it's > hard to group all the products/boards of one manufacturer into one UCM > directory. So I feel it may be better to keep the simple flat directory > structure. This wont matter if we have > 1 directory for Intel or Dell etc, as it's obvious in the naming. No mapping needed. Liam > > Thanks > Mengdong > _______________________________________________ > Alsa-devel mailing list > Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
