I dont think we need vendor (it just makes it too long). The product or board
name should be unique enough for us to load the correct files.
Liam
Yes, from the sample machines I checked, product or board name are
unique. But I feel there might be the risk that two vendors happen to
use the same product or board name, e.g. "T100TA".
I think this would be problematic from a legal/marketing position from
two different vendors so it would be unlikely.
Please don't remove the manufacturer name for now...
Some vendors use product names that are indeed unique and easy enough to
remember, but others like Lenovo use "1952W5R" or "20C3001VHH" (real
examples you can Google to see I am not making this up). The board name
can also be "SKG18 t". I really have no appetite for a UCM directory
called 20C3001VHH.SKG18t :-)
I would also be ready to bet that smaller manufacturers in the Chinese
ecosystem use similar product names at the DMI level. removing the
vendor name would likely result in mistakes.
You really want the manufacturer name to make the maintenance of these
files easier on the rest of us. Sometimes the DMI version field is
actually more self-explanatory, e.g. "ThinkPad 60" or "ThinkPad 10" for
the two Lenovo examples, maybe this is something we ought to look at.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
