On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 06:19:58PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > My point is that you've written the above in a very confusing manner - I > > > have to think about what it means while just a dependency would be clear > > > and obvious. > > Are you asking about the intent/functionality or just a simplification > > to do this (un-tested): > > depends on DW_DMAC_CORE && (SND_SST_IPC_ACPI = n) > A=n is usually written like !A, too. So a simpler form would be > depends on DW_DMAC_CORE && !SND_SST_IPC_ACPI Right, that was what I was looking for - the way the patch was written was really obscure.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
