On 3/8/16 8:43 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:49:29AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 3/4/16 10:03 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:36:33PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
- depends on DW_DMAC_CORE=y && (SND_SST_IPC_ACPI = n)
+ depends on (DW_DMAC_CORE != n) && (SND_SST_IPC_ACPI = n)
What is the expected difference between a dependency on DW_DMAC_CORE and
one on DW_DMAC_CORE != n?
No functional difference, it's more to make the menuconfig options more
obvious.
Without this patch, menuconfig will not show the legacy byt-max98090 and
byt-rt5640 options if the DW_DMAC_CORE is built as a module.
While we want to encourage folks to use the newer DPCM drivers, we also want
to leave these options accessible.
My point is that you've written the above in a very confusing manner - I
have to think about what it means while just a dependency would be clear
and obvious.
Are you asking about the intent/functionality or just a simplification
to do this (un-tested):
depends on DW_DMAC_CORE && (SND_SST_IPC_ACPI = n)
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
