On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:49:29AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 3/4/16 10:03 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:36:33PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > >>- depends on DW_DMAC_CORE=y && (SND_SST_IPC_ACPI = n) > >>+ depends on (DW_DMAC_CORE != n) && (SND_SST_IPC_ACPI = n) > >What is the expected difference between a dependency on DW_DMAC_CORE and > >one on DW_DMAC_CORE != n? > No functional difference, it's more to make the menuconfig options more > obvious. > Without this patch, menuconfig will not show the legacy byt-max98090 and > byt-rt5640 options if the DW_DMAC_CORE is built as a module. > While we want to encourage folks to use the newer DPCM drivers, we also want > to leave these options accessible. My point is that you've written the above in a very confusing manner - I have to think about what it means while just a dependency would be clear and obvious.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
