On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:37:08AM +0000, Bard Liao wrote: > Add some Intel folks. > > the target for this change is internal-only development hardware it > > doesn't seem unreasonable to expect people to be able to keep changes > > like device ID updates internally. This is one of the many costs of BIOSes > > that require us to do such DMI hacks, it'd be much better to improve the > > firmware and the driver so they can specify required properties directly > > rather than relying on DMI. > Agree. We will find a more reasonable way (maybe ACPI) to specify > required properties directly. However, I can expect that will take time. > If you think use "coreboot" is not a good idea, can we match the > DMI_PRODUCT_NAME field just like before until we finish the > implementation of specifying required properties directly? Sure, new matches for specific products are fine - it's just that this is too big a wildcard.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
