On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:13:33PM -0500, Chris Winter wrote: > I think the proposed switch to using alsa-lib's present conf file > parser code may be worth doing (even though I find the syntax to be > uglier). Otherwise, the only thing I would really like to see added to > UCM (after it gets mainlined!) is a more generic mechanism for > aliasing mixer control names, instead of how it is currently limited > to aliasing master playback/capture volumes and master This was discussed when the original review round happened a while ago and is the reason why the interfaces support other names even though the implementation can't - it means someone can just substitute in different library code without disrupting applications. Definitely on the list to do. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
