On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Liam Girdwood wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 11:35 +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Liam Girdwood wrote: >> >>>> Next step may be to support the 'amixer' like syntax for the control and >>>> mixer element handling. >>> >>> Btw, we need to try and avoid using the control ID in any mixer syntax. >>> I found that minor driver changes could change ID numbering meaning >>> major updates to config files. The mixer names are pretty constant and >>> using them has been quite painless. >> >> Definitely. I meant the full control identifier (not just numid). >> > > btw, have started any of the other API changes in use-case.c yet ? > > I could make changes to the parser ..... I am working on it slowly. I think that it would be fair to come with a functional code from my side. I will appreciate review and testing, of course. Please, give me few days. Jaroslav ----- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project, Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
