On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 11:35 +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Liam Girdwood wrote: > > >> Next step may be to support the 'amixer' like syntax for the control and > >> mixer element handling. > > > > Btw, we need to try and avoid using the control ID in any mixer syntax. > > I found that minor driver changes could change ID numbering meaning > > major updates to config files. The mixer names are pretty constant and > > using them has been quite painless. > > Definitely. I meant the full control identifier (not just numid). > btw, have started any of the other API changes in use-case.c yet ? I could make changes to the parser ..... Thanks Liam -- Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. http://www.slimlogic.co.uk _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
