On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > I don't see it are there any problems. For me it looks the routes in > WM9090 are unique and registered to own codec instance so there should > not be route prefixing needed. Meh, right. DAPM isn't coping with things that cross CODECs really. This will need to be looked at. > How these amplifier drivers are actually meant to be probed? Currently > struct snd_soc_codec_driver->probe is called only from > soc_probe_dai_link. We need to set up a list of anciliary devices which are registered without DAIs for this. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
