On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Seungwhan Youn <sw.youn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This patch adds to support Master Mode LRCLK, BCLK rates
>> setting for wm8580.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Seungwhan Youn <sw.youn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.h | 2 +
>> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c
>> index d282eb3..a2bb2a4 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c
>> @@ -705,6 +705,57 @@ static int wm8580_set_dai_clkdiv(struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai,
>> snd_soc_write(codec, WM8580_CLKSEL, reg);
>> break;
>>
>> + case WM8580_LRCLK_RATE:
>> + reg = snd_soc_read(codec, WM8580_PAIF1 + codec_dai->id);
>> + reg &= ~WM8580_AIF_RATE_MASK;
>> + switch (div) {
>> + case 128:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_RATE_128;
>> + break;
>> + case 192:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_RATE_192;
>> + break;
>> + case 256:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_RATE_256;
>> + break;
>> + case 384:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_RATE_384;
>> + break;
>> + case 512:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_RATE_512;
>> + break;
>> + case 768:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_RATE_768;
>> + break;
>> + case 1152:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_RATE_1152;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + snd_soc_write(codec, WM8580_PAIF1 + codec_dai->id, reg);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case WM8580_BCLK_RATE:
>> + reg = snd_soc_read(codec, WM8580_PAIF1 + codec_dai->id);
>> + reg &= ~WM8580_AIF_BCLKSEL_MASK;
>> + switch (div) {
>> + case 64:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_BCLKSEL_64;
>> + break;
>> + case 32:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_BCLKSEL_32;
>> + break;
>> + case 16:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_BCLKSEL_16;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + reg |= WM8580_AIF_BCLKSEL_SYSCLK;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + snd_soc_write(codec, WM8580_PAIF1 + codec_dai->id, reg);
>> + break;
>> +
>> default:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.h b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.h
>> index aeb65ef..2272e36 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.h
>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.h
>> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
>> #define WM8580_DAC_CLKSEL 2
>> #define WM8580_ADC_CLKSEL 3
>> #define WM8580_CLKOUTSRC 4
>> +#define WM8580_LRCLK_RATE 5
>> +#define WM8580_BCLK_RATE 6
>>
>> #define WM8580_CLKSRC_MCLK 1
>> #define WM8580_CLKSRC_ADCMCLK 2
>
> Again.... http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2009-September/021005.html
>
> Also IMO, WM8580_MCLKRATIO and WM8580_BCLKRATIO sound better
> than WM8580_LRCLK_RATE and WM8580_BCLK_RATE resp. That is if they
> are to be accepted.
>
When I write this code, I also think that name 'WM8580_MCLKRATIO' and
'WM8580_BCLKTRATIO'. But I think that 'WM8580_LRCLK_RATE' and
'WM8580_BCLK_RATE' is better because of these are named after wm8580
user manual, to avoid to be confused another guy who see this code
with wm8580 manual. If other guys think same as you, I'm ready to
modify this. :)
Thanks for your opinion. :)
Claude
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
