At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:39:16 +0300,
Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 19 July 2010 19:25:55 ext Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:30:38 +0100,
> >
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:14:49PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > > > I see, but I still don't see problem with this:
> > > Meh, that works but I guess my brain can't imagine concepts that ugly :)
> >
> > TLV_DB_MINMAX would be slightly easier to parse:
> >
> > static const unsigned int tlv[] = {
> > TLV_DB_RANGE_HEAD(3),
> > 1, 3, TLV_DB_MINMAX_ITEM(0, 400),
> > 3, 4, TLV_DB_MINMAX_ITEM(400, 500)
> > 4, 6, TLV_DB_MINMAX_ITEM(500, 900),
> > };
>
> I agree, that the TLV_DB_MINMAX might be easier to digest, but I want to keep
> the TLV_DB_SCALE in these drivers (tpa6130a2, and tlw4030).
> I might need to limit the volume range, and that is not really possible with the
> MINMAX (the ASoC volume limiting only works with TLV_DB_SCALE type).
OK, it sounds reasonable.
thanks,
Takashi
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
