Hi,
On Monday 19 July 2010 19:25:55 ext Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:30:38 +0100,
>
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:14:49PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > > I see, but I still don't see problem with this:
> > Meh, that works but I guess my brain can't imagine concepts that ugly :)
>
> TLV_DB_MINMAX would be slightly easier to parse:
>
> static const unsigned int tlv[] = {
> TLV_DB_RANGE_HEAD(3),
> 1, 3, TLV_DB_MINMAX_ITEM(0, 400),
> 3, 4, TLV_DB_MINMAX_ITEM(400, 500)
> 4, 6, TLV_DB_MINMAX_ITEM(500, 900),
> };
I agree, that the TLV_DB_MINMAX might be easier to digest, but I want to keep
the TLV_DB_SCALE in these drivers (tpa6130a2, and tlw4030).
I might need to limit the volume range, and that is not really possible with the
MINMAX (the ASoC volume limiting only works with TLV_DB_SCALE type).
--
Péter
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
