At Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:32:08 +0300,The Source wrote:> > Bjoern Olausson пишет:> >> Latest unstable (25Oct 19:57) works from command line with mplayer,> >> without the proc oss fix.> >>> >> > > Confirmed.> > The stuttering got better, but is still present.> >> > Xine works flawless.> >> > > >> aplay still works but only with dmix.> >>> >> > > Samplingrate 11025Hz and 8000Hz do not play a clear sinus, sounds a> > bit scratchy..> > All other common samplingrates work flawless. Could someone confirm that?> > http://tmp.olausson.de/30days/0_16_s_8000.wav> > http://tmp.olausson.de/30days/0_16_s_11025.wav> > http://tmp.olausson.de/30days/0_16_s_96000.wav> >> > Just using "aplay file.wav"> >> > More noticable ist it when using mplayer. Crackles a lot with 8000Hz and 11025Hz> > "mplayer file.wav"> >> > mmh, xine crackles too. Please someone confirm, otherwise the files may be bad.> >> > > >> Now also almost working in gnome with pulse, sound is recognisable but> >> with lots of interference/corruption.> >>> >> > > No pulseaudio on my machine. Sry.> >> > > >> Machine did not crash at any point!> >>> >> > > Just observed a X crash when using smplayer to play a avi. When I> > closed smplayer while the movie was playing X crashed. (But could be> > unrelated to audio, I could not reproduce it)> >> > But no crash or freez so far.> >> > > >> This was running on 2.6.26... is this a problem? SUPPORTED_KERNELS says> >> 2.6.25 or earlier?> >>> >> > > I am using vanilla 2.6.27.3> >> > Thanks for you awesome work!> >> > By the way, what's next on your plan when stereo output and recording> > is working flawless?> >> >> > kind regards> > Bjoern> > _______________________________________________> > Alsa-devel mailing list> > Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel> >> > > Tried the latest driver.> All is fine (haven't tested recording however) except pulseaudio > (doesn't work) and wine (sound is mega-glitchy, possibly because of > strange period and buffer sizes it uses: period=544, buffer=8704). Maybe due to the sample rate? I guess with 48kHz it would be a moresane period/buffer size. thanks, Takashi_______________________________________________Alsa-devel mailing listAlsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel