On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 03:34:18PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > There's a third option -- instead of migrating the alsa-devel list, we can > > migrate all activity to linux-sound@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. It's an existing list > > that currently sees about 5 messages a year (and most of them are cc'd to > > alsa-devel anyway). > > That would definitely work well from my point of view. Okay, since it doesn't really affect anything, I've reconfigured the patchwork side of things to accept patches sent both to alsa-devel and linux-sound. If you do want to go down the route of shifting everything towards linux-sound, the next step (once everyone is in agreement), is to make the changes to MAINTAINERS. You don't have to do all subsystems at once, you can start with the SOUND subsystem to trial things out and then shift others if everything is working correctly. -K
