Hi Jaroslav, On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 09:49:52PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > At present I prefer separated pages from source since the pages can be > generated from the source, however as you say the inclusive way is worth > to reduce repository maintained by the project. I test the idea later in > my libhinoko repository. When it looks well, I'll request you for > configuration change. I'd like to fix the issue for the URL of documentation before releasing libhitaki since I put the URL to configuration for gi-docgen. I'm investigating to put the documentation into the same repository where source is maintained, however I prefer to separate the two into different repositories. Then I suppose it good to put several documentations into one repository rather than maintaining them in different repositories. At present, three repositories are maintained for documentations: * https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-gobject-docs * https://github.com/alsa-project/libhinawa-docs * https://github.com/alsa-project/libhitaki-doc Let us consolidate them in one repository. For example, by referring to team name: * https://github.com/alsa-project/gobject-introspection-docs/ The documentations are expected to be public under below URL: * https://alsa-project.github.io/gobject-introspection-docs/alsa-gobject/ * https://alsa-project.github.io/gobject-introspection-docs/hinawa/ * https://alsa-project.github.io/gobject-introspection-docs/hitaki/ I'd like to ask your opinion about the idea. Thanks Takashi Sakamoto
