RE: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, October 3, 2020 2:11 AM
> To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ertman, David M <david.m.ertman@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-
> rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; alsa-
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client
> support
> 
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:04:52PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > I don't know why did you send this series separately to every mailing
> > list, but it is not correct thing to do.
> >
> > RDMA ML and discussion:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201001050534.890666-1-
> david.m.ertman@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> > Netdev ML (completely separated):
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201001050851.890722-1-
> david.m.ertman@xxxxxxxxx/
> > Alsa ML (separated too):
> > https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20200930225051.889607-1-
> david.m.ertman@xxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Seems like the goal was to spread it around to different places so that
> no one could strongly object or review it :(
> 
> greg k-h

This was my first time sending a patchset to more than one mailing list
and I screwed it up.

I will be sending a v2 soon (Monday maybe?) and I will be sending it to 
all CC's and mailing list in one send so that everyone will see everyone's
response.

Sorry for the mistake.

-DaveE.




[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux