Re: [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:24:07PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:04:52PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > I don't know why did you send this series separately to every mailing
> > > list, but it is not correct thing to do.
> > >
> > > RDMA ML and discussion:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201001050534.890666-1-david.m.ertman@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> > > Netdev ML (completely separated):
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201001050851.890722-1-david.m.ertman@xxxxxxxxx/
> > > Alsa ML (separated too):
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20200930225051.889607-1-david.m.ertman@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Seems like the goal was to spread it around to different places so that
> > no one could strongly object or review it :(
> 
> It took me time to realize why I was alone expressing my thoughts :).
> 
> BTW, I'm looking on ALSA thread and happy to see that people didn't like
> "ancillary" name. It is far from intuitive name for any non-English speaker.

It's not intuitive for a native-english speaker either :)

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux