Re: [PATCH 7/9] dsnoop: Another bug where the empty, not full, part of the ringbuffer was observed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mark Hills <mark@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] dsnoop: Another bug where the empty, not full, part of the ringbuffer was observed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:00:05 +0200
Cc: alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200622131515.23385-7-mark@xwax.org>
References: <2006221356390.20421@stax.localdomain> <20200622131515.23385-7-mark@xwax.org>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:15:13 +0200,
Mark Hills wrote:
> 
> This looks like a simple mistake dating back to 2003 (commit 7470a5b9)
> where code originated from dmix.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hills <mark@xxxxxxxx>

Thanks, applied.


Takashi

References:
- Re: alsa-lib: Bug fixes to namehint, dsnoop and minor changes
  - From: Mark Hills
- [PATCH 7/9] dsnoop: Another bug where the empty, not full, part of the ringbuffer was observed
  - From: Mark Hills

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/9] dsnoop: The stop threshold was not implemented correctly
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 8/9] dsnoop: Make use of the (previously unused) function
Previous by thread: [PATCH 7/9] dsnoop: Another bug where the empty, not full, part of the ringbuffer was observed
Next by thread: [PATCH 4/9] dsnoop: The delay presented to snd_pcm_status_delay() was incorrect
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [ALSA User] [Linux Audio Users] [Pulse Audio] [Kernel Archive] [Asterisk PBX] [Photo Sharing] [Linux Sound] [Video 4 Linux] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux