Re: [PATCH 6/9] dsnoop: The stop threshold was not implemented correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:15:12 +0200,
Mark Hills wrote:
> 
> The previous implementation would mean that stop_threshold behaved
> erratically. The intent is to detect that the buffer is too full,
> and stop.
> 
> In practice, I don't think this was a bug in practice for applications
> which don't adjust the stop_threshold. The line above catches those cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hills <mark@xxxxxxxx>

Thanks, applied.


Takashi



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux