Hi Mark, Pierre-Louis Thank you for your feedback > > I would still like to make sure we have an broadbrush idea of what the 2nd > > step might be. It seems to me it's not possible to avoid having a notion of > > source/sink inside of a dailink (the wording is probably not right e.g. for > > full duplex, maybe domain1/domain2 component1/component2 are more accurate). > > The dais are exposed by different components and are really the hook by > > which the components can be configured with compatible settings. > > We at least have the notion of clock master but that's something that > could potentially vary at runtime so not stable. Like you say finding > appropriate language to talk about these things is tricky and I'm also > struggling to think of anything better than numbered components. If my understanding was correct, Lars-Peter's presentation at ELCE was using idea of "Bridge". This idea is not exist in current ALSA SoC, but current DAI can be updated to it ? Then, current notion can be udated also? I'm not 100% understanding how to update, how to use, etc, but my Image is... sink source +---+ +---+ |DAI|--->|DAI| +---+ +---+ ----> +------------+ | Bridge | +------------+ Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
