On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 09:36:17AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > I would still like to make sure we have an broadbrush idea of what the 2nd > step might be. It seems to me it's not possible to avoid having a notion of > source/sink inside of a dailink (the wording is probably not right e.g. for > full duplex, maybe domain1/domain2 component1/component2 are more accurate). > The dais are exposed by different components and are really the hook by > which the components can be configured with compatible settings. We at least have the notion of clock master but that's something that could potentially vary at runtime so not stable. Like you say finding appropriate language to talk about these things is tricky and I'm also struggling to think of anything better than numbered components.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
