>> It not that nasty considering the two licenses are perfectly compatible. >> That being said, I'll try and do something about it. Any idea what extra >> text needs to be added to say this license OR that license. > > As mentioned earlier, I basically don't like a dual license because > it's ambiguous when a third person adds/modifies the code. I don't > think it would be a big issue in the case of small codes like > resampler, though. I'm not sure what you expect here... There's no way I'm going to make my code LGPL-only just so it makes it nicer in ALSA. > Do you already have a patch for inclusion to the alsa-lib tree? > If yes, I'd like to merge it before 1.0.14 release very much... What kind of patch do you mean? I thought it was just a matter of moving the files around from alsa-plugins to alsa-lib. I've also made a couple changes to the code recently, so I'll send you a patch for that as well. Let me know when I need to send them for the 1.0.14 release. Jean-Marc _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
