On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Takashi Iwai wrote: > It's fine because snd_ctl_eme_read() and snd_ctl_elem_write() are > really corresponding 1:1. The write is just write, and the read is > just read. It might be for TLV, too. But I agree, we have basically two "write" requests: 1) do a TLV command processing 2) do a TLV value write operation In such case, I think that we need third ioctl TLV_COMMAND? I can rename write_flag to op_flag or so and we are fine. Also creating ACCESS_TLV_COMMAND might make sense. It's ok for you? The only bad thing is that the TLV write replaces the whole TLV tree for the user elements. Perhaps, a flag can be added to 'struct snd_ctl_tlv' which will mean 'partial write', so we can distinguish the full / partial operations and implement only full write at the time. Jaroslav ----- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxx> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project, SUSE Labs Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
