Re: Its Offical "787"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I suspect that the FAA changed the way they issued TCDSs after the 707 because 
it doesn't make a lot of sense to have different sheets for the same series of 
aircraft and maybe they came to that realization.

Mark

Quoting David MR <damiross3@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> The 707/720 family of aircraft are certified with the FAA under three
> different Type Certificate Data Sheets (TCDS).  For those not familiar with
> the TCDS, here's the definition:  "The Type Certificate Data Sheets (TCDS)
> database is a repository of Make and Model information. The TCDS is a formal
> description of the aircraft, engine or propeller. It lists limitations and
> information required for type certification including airspeed limits,
> weight limits, thrust limitations, etc."
> 
> The TCDS can be found at http://tinyurl.com/47qze (long URL:
> http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/Ma
> inFrame?OpenFrameSet )
> 
> Here's the TCDS for the 707/720 family:
> 707-100, -200: TCDS 4A21
> 707-300, -400: TCDS 4A26 (I was surprised to see that the 100/200 series and
> 300/400 series had different TCDS)
> 720: TCDS 4A28
> 
> David R
> http://home.comcast.net/~damiross/books.html
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> mgreenwood@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 13:41
> To: AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Its Offical "787"
> 
> 
> The 757 & 767 were developed concurrently although the 767 did have it's
> first
> flight approximately 5 months before the 757.  As for the 720, the 707 was
> designated the 720 when it was modified for short-to-medium routes and for
> use
> on shorter runways. I guess they didn't consider it a separate model, just
> like the 777-200 and 777-300 aren't different models.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> Quoting David MR <damiross3@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > >Since the naming of the initial 707, all Boeing commercial jets have
> > >>been named in succession based on the 7-7 formula: 717, 727, 737, 747,
> > >757, 767 and 777 up to the latest Boeing commercial jet transport, the
> 787.
> >
> > Not quite true.  There was the 720.  And the succession shown above is not
> > correct.  The 717 came last.  The first 717 was actually a military
> version
> > of the 707. Also, if I'm not mistaken, the 767 saw service before the 757.
> >
> > David R
> > http://home.comcast.net/~damiross/books.html
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.1 - Release Date: 1/27/2005
> >
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.1 - Release Date: 1/27/2005
> 
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.1 - Release Date: 1/27/2005
> 

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]