Re: SP vs. 400

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



QF 743's have been here a few times this year..in svc for QF and FJ (Air
Pacific) usually VH-EBX

thedarkstar2 wrote:

> Dont know if this helps but I was definatly on a QF 743 SYD-LAX non stop in
> 1996 and 1997.
>
> Dave
> MEL
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Grant McKenzie" <gjmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:17 PM
> Subject: Re: SP vs. 400
>
> > I don't think they ever did this due to payload restrictions. With a
> > reasonable pax load the 200s and 300s always needed a stop in HNL. It
> > wasn't until the 400 was released that anybody could fly the Pacific
> non-stop.
> >
> > As an aside, I know the SP flew SYD-HNL-YVR but I don't recall them flying
> > to LAX. Could be wrong, though.
> >
> > Grant
> > SYD
> > QF
> >
> >
> > At 04:39 PM 05/08/03 -0400, you wrote:
> > >In a message dated 8/5/2003 1:30:37 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> RWM@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >writes:
> > >
> > ><< Don't think so, but Qantas would now.  It made JFK-NRT, for sure,
> > >  but that's over 1000 miles shorter. >>
> > >
> > >Over 1000 miles shorter, with nice winds coming back to JFK
> > >
> > >Well, Grant, since you are the main regular Aussie, did QF ever fly a
> 742B or
> > >a 743 nonstop LAX-SYD or LAX-MEL?  Or did they only do it with the SPs
> until
> > >the 744s came.  Also, did the SPs have weight restrictions, or could they
> be
> > >loaded to the hilt?
> >

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]