U-turn on capital airport screeners

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



U-turn on capital airport screeners
By Tony Bizjak -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 a.m. PDT Wednesday, June 11, 2003

In an abrupt about-face, federal officials say they now plan to add 22
security checkpoint screeners at Sacramento International Airport, dropping
their disputed month-old plan to lay off 112 screeners. Airport officials,
who were set to fight the cuts, say they are delighted that the
Transportation Security Administration changed its mind. "We were dismayed
by the announced cuts, so this is good news," said Frances Sherertz,
assistant director of county airports. The new screeners give Sacramento a
total of 360, TSA officials said. The federal agency was established by
Congress to help provide safer air travel following the Sept. 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks. Before the attacks, private security firms, under
contract to the airlines, hired minimum-wage workers with little training
to screen passengers. Within 14 months, the TSA hired 30,000 screeners at
jobs paying $23,600 to $35,400 a year. Workers were required to be U.S.
citizens, have a high school diploma and undergo more than 100 hours of
training.

In May, however, Congress set budget constraints that called for the
elimination of 6,000 screeners. About 3,000 positions were cut from
airports nationwide, 17 by attrition from Sacramento International. Federal
officials say they still plan to cut an additional 3,000 screeners
nationwide by Sept. 30. Los Angeles International Airport is scheduled to
lose 46 of its 2,451 screeners. San Francisco International Airport is
exempt because its screeners were hired under a test program. In
Sacramento, airport officials have argued that losing screeners would
increase passengers' wait in lines that are often too long at Terminal A,
the portal for popular Southwest Airlines. About 10,000 passengers pass
through all the airport's security checkpoints daily, officials said. The
average wait, from the moment a passenger gets in the back of the line
until that passenger is free to go to his or her gate, is slightly more
than five minutes, not considered bad.

But an airport review showed that on some days that average jumps to 10
minutes, and at a peak moment on a busy Friday the wait hit a high of 35
minutes. That didn't include the time passengers spent in line at the
airline ticketing and bag check counter. "Thirty-five minutes, you're
pretty unhappy, you're pretty steamed," Sherertz said. "The customer
service standard we are shooting for is nothing in excess of 10 minutes,
not (just) an average of 10 minutes." Airport officials said they are
asking federal officials to be more flexible by assigning more screeners
during peak hours, possibly on part-time shifts. A security official said
Tuesday that the answer may be to add more metal detectors to the six
already in place. He said that during peak times, such as the morning
commute, it is not unusual for passengers to miss their flights --
typically people who don't arrive the recommended two hours early.

The airport study, conducted hourly during 16 days in May, showed that
lines to and through the security checks and metal detectors generally are
short at Terminal B, averaging about two minutes. But wait times in that
terminal at times exceeded 10 minutes during peak travel hours at 6 a.m.
and 2 p.m. Sacramento airport officials took their May measurements to
dispute -- at least for Terminal A -- earlier federal estimates that wait
times at Sacramento International averaged just two minutes. Federal
spokesman Nico Melendez said federal estimates are based on how long people
wait from the moment they show their ticket to a security agent to the
moment they are cleared from the security area. Airport officials countered
that passengers often wait in lines for many minutes before they get to the
ticket checker.

At Terminal A, that line can often extend down the escalator and into the
baggage area. Officials said that the $58 million terminal, although it is
only 5 years old, was not designed to handle that kind of congestion and
probably will have to be remodeled at some point. In May, when federal
officials announced the plan to lay off airport screeners, they said they
would cut 112 of Sacramento's 355 screeners. Since then, attrition has
reduced the work force to 338. On Friday, in a brief e-mail to the airport,
federal security officials said they had reconsidered and now plan to hire
22 more screeners for Sacramento -- for a total of 360. Federal spokesman
Melendez said the original cuts were done in a hurry and based on generic
estimates. Since then, officials have reanalyzed all airports, and talked
with officials at many of them, to better understand each airport's needs.
Melendez said the administration is committed to cutting 6,000 screeners
nationwide. He said that will not compromise airport security, because all
passengers must still pass through security checkpoints. Passenger Adam
Ray, standing in a short line Tuesday afternoon in Sacramento's Terminal A,
said he came early and doesn't mind waiting. "Doesn't bother me one bit,"
he said. "Patience is a virtue. If you're in a hurry, you shoulda left
yesterday."


***************************************************
The owner of Roger's Trinbago Site/TnTisland.com
Roj (Roger James)

escape email mailto:ejames@xxxxxxxxx
Trinbago site: www.tntisland.com
Carib Brass Ctn site www.tntisland.com/caribbeanbrassconnection/
Steel Expressions www.mts.net/~ejames/se/
Mas Site: www.tntisland.com/tntrecords/mas2003/
Site of the Week: http://www.carib-link.net/naparima/naps.html
TnT Webdirectory: http://search.co.tt
*********************************************************

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]