Re: Providence drops extension plan for secondary runway

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I would lay you 2 to 1 odds that the environmental plan for the extension is
flawed in favor of those who bought near the airport.
David R.
http://home.attbi.com/~damiross
http://www.secure-skies.org/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alireza Alivandivafa" <DEmocrat2n@xxxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] Providence drops extension plan for secondary runway


> In a message dated 5/23/2003 12:17:43 PM Eastern Standard Time,
damiross2@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > Politicians are not only stupid but also suffer from short sightedness.
Build
> > an extension now or pay a lot more in the future.  And the people living
near
> > the airport?  MOVE!  If you buy or rent a house near an airport, expect
noise,
> > you idiots!
> >
> > A swamp is a swamp, no matter what you call it.  I'd rather have
"wetlands"
> > utilized for something useful than just sitting there
> > getting wet.
>
>   Figured you might say something like this David.  Normally, I am all for
giving the shaft to people who live near airports, because they did make the
choice to live there.  As long as the airport was built before the
residential area sprung up, they have no complaint.  It is like Westchester
here in LA.  LAX started as a landing strip in the middle of an orchard, and
built up from there.  Rich people moved there for who-know's what reason,
but it is obviously linked to the fact that there is an AIRPORT there
boosting the economy.  So they fight baddly needed plans to expand, get free
sound proofing and still complain.  And this is at an airport that only
allows stage 3 all day long and only runs take offs over the ocean.  If PVD
was there before those people, they have no complaint.
>   That said, I don't think they should expand because of the environmental
impact.  Those wetlands probably hold a lot of bio-diversity that was there
way before the airport and keeps the eco-system healthy.  Given that, they
should not extend the crosswind runway.  And what the hell makes them think
that international carriers are going to pass up BOS?  They should be happy
that place is a mess so they get WN
>
> AA

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]