Re: Concorde future 'under review'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've seen the official report on the French gov't accident investigation site.  I'll try to dredge up the URL.

Mike Gammon

>
> From: WaterskiPilot@aol.com
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:28:44 EST
> To: AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU
> Subject: Re: Concorde future 'under review'
>
> In a message dated 2/26/2003 3:22:18 PM Central Standard Time,
> jmgammon@sympatico.ca writes:
>
>
> > Whatever, FOD appears to be the cause.
> >
> Well, that is what the article is talking about, is it FOD (Continental) or
> the runway light?  Technically, it wasn't FOD until the airplane hit it and
> it came loose.  I wish I could find out where it came from.  Is there any
> official report about the accident on the web?
>
> Jim
>
> Jim Hann
> Waterski J-41 Captain
> Lambert-St. Louis Airport (STL/KSTL)
>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]