http://www.bea-fr.org/docspa/2000/f-sc000725/htm/part1.1-1.12.htm French only unfortunately. Not a problem for me but not likely to endear itself to others. Mike Gammon > > From: Mike Gammon <jmgammon@sympatico.ca> > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:41:34 -0500 > To: AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU > Subject: Re: Concorde future 'under review' > > I've seen the official report on the French gov't accident investigation site. I'll try to dredge up the URL. > > Mike Gammon > > > > > From: WaterskiPilot@aol.com > > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:28:44 EST > > To: AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU > > Subject: Re: Concorde future 'under review' > > > > In a message dated 2/26/2003 3:22:18 PM Central Standard Time, > > jmgammon@sympatico.ca writes: > > > > > > > Whatever, FOD appears to be the cause. > > > > > Well, that is what the article is talking about, is it FOD (Continental) or > > the runway light? Technically, it wasn't FOD until the airplane hit it and > > it came loose. I wish I could find out where it came from. Is there any > > official report about the accident on the web? > > > > Jim > > > > Jim Hann > > Waterski J-41 Captain > > Lambert-St. Louis Airport (STL/KSTL) > > >