Re: Speaking of Montreal... / PTV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



AIRLINE:

PTV's then are still used at many airports. I recall
them at Mirabel, IAD and JFK, given my experience some
years ago.

Mike Burris
Cambridge, Mass


--- Antoin Daltun <adaltun@eircom.net> wrote:
> I was on an international airlines' committee which
> tried to influence the
> project.
>
> We all said repeatedly that it wasn't wanted and we
> didn't need and we
> didn't want PTVs.
> In fact, most of us wanted to go to Toronto, but
> some bilaterals required
> Montreal.
>
> We said that if we have to pay for Mirabel, then
> Ste-Scholastique, some
> airlines will be forced out of Montreal altogether.
>
> I was with Aer Lingus, which did leave though that
> was more related to the
> arrival of the B747 as the only aircraft which had a
> realistic break-even
> load factor with the then seasonality and fares mix,
> and it was realistic
> only on Boston and JFK.
>
> The bilateral still requires Shannon-Montreal, while
> the main traffic flow
> would be Dublin-Toronto.  Since 2002, Air Canada
> operate
> Toronto-Shannon-Dublin seasonally with B767s on a
> waiver basis.  Previously,
> the traffic went mostly on charters and via London,
> England.
>
> Antoin Daltun
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Gammon" <jmgammon@sympatico.ca>
>    For international
> > arrivals, YMX is/was far more efficient than YUL.
> Hopefully the new
> > terminal building additions for YUL, which
> apparently include new arrivals
> > area for int'l and cross-border, will improve
> things.
> >
> > Mike Gammon
> >

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]