Re: FAA amd ETOPs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ETOPS was called EROPS (Extended Range Ops).  They may change it back to
that acronym.

EROPS/ETOPS has never applied to non-commercial operations.  Twin bizjets
have been crossing oceans for years.

David Ross
http://home.attbi.com/~damiross/airlines.html

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerard M Foley" <gfoley@columbus.rr.com>
To: <AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 19:49
Subject: Re: [AIRLINE] FAA amd ETOPs


> Thanks for the information on the A340 and ATL-JNB.
>
> Are foreign airline flights originating or terminating in the US subject
to
> FAA rules such as those governing ETOPS?
>
> I note from other respondents that the acronym will have to be changed if
> the rule is extended to three and four engine airplanes. (:-))
>
> By the way, is there something corresponding to it relating to single
engine
> planes?  Couldn't have applied to Voyager, could it?  I guess neither
person
> was a paying passenger in that case.
>
> Gerry
> http://foley.ultinet.net/~gerry/africar/africa.html
> http://home.columbus.rr.com/gfoley
> http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/pollock/263/egypt/egypt.html
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nick Laflamme" <dplaflamme@alumni.nd.edu>
> To: <AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:15 AM
> Subject: Re: FAA amd ETOPs
>
>
> > At 10:53 AM 12/18/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Do any U.S. airlines fly A340?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > >Apparently the proposed change of 4-engine ETOPS rules might require
> > >change of some B747 routes.
> >
> > You mean the proposal that three and four-engined jets will also have to
> > observe the 207 minute rule, I presume.
> >
> > >A couple of weeks ago I took the SAA B747-400 non-stop from Atlanta to
> > >Jo'berg.  Does that route keep within the ETOPS distances all the way?
> >
> > Time to remind people of gc.kls2.com. :-)
> >
> > ATL-JNB is shown as within 180 minute limits, and the proposal is for
207
> > minute limits. They'd have to use a slightly longer course at 138 minute
> > limits (2 hours plus 15%; 207 minutes is 3 hours plus 15%), but that's
not
> > the proposal.
> >
> > Nick
> >
>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]