On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:22 PM Zack Weinberg <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023, at 2:03 PM, Frederic Berat wrote: > > I admit I usually don't build the package for i386 since autoconf isn't > > arch dependent, but I did it this time and there are few test failures: > > > > 420: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE FAILED ( > semantics.at:908) > > 421: AC_SYS_YEAR2038 FAILED ( > semantics.at:917) > > 422: AC_SYS_YEAR2038_RECOMMENDED FAILED ( > semantics.at:926) > > This is <https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110983>. It can only > affect > projects that use one of the above three macros while AC_LANG([C++]) or > AC_LANG([ObjC]) is active, and it's harmless on a system with 64-bit off_t. > Furthermore, the changes that would be required to fix it properly seem a > bit > too risky considering I want to make the release this week and not six > weeks > from now. I could be persuaded otherwise with an example of a real > project that > breaks, or a patch that turns out less invasive than I expect, or both. > Fair enough. I also get this one that fails once in a while (3 failures out of 12 executions): 11: autoconf: forbidden tokens, basic FAILED (tools.at:481) So far I got it on aarch64 and s390x. Timing issue maybe ? Mass rebuild is ongoing, I probably won't have the result before tomorrow, or maybe late this evening. > zw > >
