Re: M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: autoconf@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash
From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:11:21 +0100
In-reply-to: <alpine.GSO.2.20.2003131316220.5375@scrappy.simplesystems.org>
Mail-followup-to: autoconf@xxxxxxx
References: <CAKCAbMgi6TmDe8xGv-VMD-8ynyz=AonZ30x8_WkXLNPa6B+POA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.2.20.2003121053350.19644@scrappy.simplesystems.org> <CAKCAbMjVZyEYuobAMahUDotX+kBR8p0VUgLAr16QN7zspd7GEA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.2.20.2003121557100.19644@scrappy.simplesystems.org> <20200313174858.GB4525@prajna.paris.inria.fr> <alpine.GSO.2.20.2003131316220.5375@scrappy.simplesystems.org>

I did experiment on two projects and didn't observe that noticeable
differences either.

Sébastien.

References:
- M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash
  - From: Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash
  - From: Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash
  - From: Sébastien Hinderer
- Re: M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash
  - From: Bob Friesenhahn

Prev by Date: Re: M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash
Next by Date: Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future
Previous by thread: Re: M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash
Next by thread: Re: M4sh tests 77 and 78 vs /bin/sh -> dash
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [GCC Help] [Kernel Discussion] [RPM Discussion] [Red Hat Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux USB] [Samba]

Powered by Linux