Re: conditionally using libtool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx> writes:
> * Russ Allbery wrote on Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:41:39PM CEST:

>> which is why use of it is conditional in INN.  The approach that we're
>> using required figuring out what macros to call first, but it works
>> well enough that I'll keep using it until someone comes up with
>> something better.  It's certainly better than the speed hit from using
>> libtool unconditionally.

> Which is fine.  All I want to avoid is that anyone using this approach
> comes and complains when it breaks with the next Libtool release.

Oh, understood.  I promise I won't complain, and I'll start using better
techniques as soon as I see them.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux