Hi Russ, * Russ Allbery wrote on Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:41:39PM CEST: > > Libtool is painfully, *painfully* slow, Yes. I know. > which is why use of it is > conditional in INN. The approach that we're using required figuring out > what macros to call first, but it works well enough that I'll keep using > it until someone comes up with something better. It's certainly better > than the speed hit from using libtool unconditionally. Which is fine. All I want to avoid is that anyone using this approach comes and complains when it breaks with the next Libtool release. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
