Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx> writes: > * Bob Rossi wrote on Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 06:18:54PM CEST: >> OK, so is the only safe way to do this to have 2 configure.in scripts? >> One that uses AC_PROG_LIBTOOL and one that doesn't? > I don't see why that would be necessary. Unless you need to avoid the > Automake adjustments it does for Libtool. Libtool is painfully, *painfully* slow, which is why use of it is conditional in INN. The approach that we're using required figuring out what macros to call first, but it works well enough that I'll keep using it until someone comes up with something better. It's certainly better than the speed hit from using libtool unconditionally. -- Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
