Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I will submit it to debian-legal when you arrive at the final form of the > patch, along with the following question: OK, thanks. It appears that discussion has died down, so you can say we're considering the patch to Autoconf contained in <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2004-12/msg00105.html> to address what appears to be the principle DFSG issue for Autoconf, and wonder whether that suffices. > Please contact "Benjamin Mako Hill" <mako@xxxxxxxxxx>, he can > position you on how the Debian and the FSF talks about the issue are > going, and what to expect from both sides. I'm not sure I want to be involved deeply in that discussion -- I've got too many other things to do -- but I'll CC: this message to him to let him know about the situation with Autoconf. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
