Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The GFDL is troubling to some, however, the GPL applies to *programs* > so it is not an appropriate license for documentation. If we consider autoconf.texi to be part of a program that generates the documentation, what makes the GPL inappropriate? In what sense does the GPL provide inadequate protection here? > It makes more sense to adjust GFDL so it is not so controversial I understand that's been tried, so far unsuccessfully. I don't know the details, though. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
