Roger Leigh <rleigh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Is C99 really 100% upward compatible with the previous version of the >> standard, or is it possibly more strict and include type changes which >> might impact library ABIs? > > I believe that it's entirely compatible, providing you don't use the > new datatypes. You might use them without knowing it. E.g., in C90, size_t fits in unsigned long, but in C99, it may not. paul _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
