Re: C99 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Roger Leigh wrote:

It would be great if in the next year, AC_PROG_CC could default to using a C99 compiler. Since it should be backward-compatible with C89 (??), this shouldn't be required, but I would really like to see C99 as the default, with some means of choosing an older standard if so required.

Do you have a purpose for using C99 other than to intentionally write non-portable software?


Is C99 really 100% upward compatible with the previous version of the standard, or is it possibly more strict and include type changes which might impact library ABIs?

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen


_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux