Re: yum criticism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 16, 2006, at 8:20 AM, Thomas Hartwig wrote:

1. Yum is really slow in comparison to apt.

Then use apt.

You might often heard this and the reasons might be quite complex, but for an end user like me it is really annoying how yum is fetching everything again upon restart.

/etc/yum.conf:

metadata_expire=604800

It'll only reload your cache once a week.

Also, 3.0.1 can make use of a cache-loader written in C so it's much faster to load the cache. As far as fetching the RPM metadata in the first place, well, that's between you and the repository.

2. Yum leaks major features:
- support of source repositories

See yum-utils.

- support of version selection

Explain.

I know these ones have discussed already some times, but what me makes angry are the answers of the developers (very simplified):

- This feature would break the system of the user.
- Why should a user want to use this, since he has not written linux.

References?

I want to cut here because I think this makes clear my major points. I'm sorry if I was to rude and I thank for all volunteers working on yum and have made linux to what it is today. But I had to let it go...

You get what you pay for. The yum source is here in case you'd like to contribute:

http://linux.duke.edu/projects/yum/cvs.ptml

j.
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux