On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:51:55AM -0400, Chip Turner wrote: > What a convenient way to continue a campaign of vagueness and not > actually try to solve any problems. Funny, I see from mail archives > you not clamming up and stopping discussion when others use that kind > of language. Where? http://www.google.de/search?q=%22axel+thimm%22+fuck > If you or anyone else can produce a verifiable or reproducible > example of yum actually damaging a system, I'll give you $100 USD or > donate it to your favorite charity. Otherwise, stop waging a war of > misinformation and FUD. > > If yum is so broken, it should be an easy hundred bucks to collect, > right? Check the thread, I'm not the reporter. Someone else used yum and blew his alsa support. Let him have your bounty. > Chip > > Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I'm sorry Seth, your choice of language has crossed a barrier. I hope > > Karsten will still want to report on his broken alsa systems. > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:27:02AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > >> If it sounds like I'm pissed, I am. I'm tired of this horse-shit > >> grab-ass of apt vs yum. If you want to use apt, more power to you, if > >> you want tell people that yum 'munges' systems then you damn well better > >> show me a bug report that backs it up. So far no one has shown me > >> anything. So continue recommending apt, feel free, but shut the fuck up > >> about yum munging things until you bring me a bug report. > > > -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20050527/539ea21f/attachment.bin
