seth vidal wrote: >On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 15:21 -0700, Karsten Jeppesen wrote: > > >>seth vidal wrote: >> >> >>>On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 15:05 -0700, Karsten Jeppesen wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I lately read that on FC3 systems apt is the recommended depsolver and >>>>that yum is known to munge FC3 systems. >>>>Personally I haven't had any such problems, but I would like to know if >>>>anybody here knows something about that issue. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>read where? >>> >>>There's no evidence in bugzilla that has happened and I get all yum bugs >>>from yum bugzilla and rh bugzilla. >>> >>> >>> >>Sorry Seth, >> >>Given the circumstances I respectfully decline to say who and where. >>And I am not trying to be a pain in the butt. >>I don't intent a shouting match - I am just looking for if there is >>anything to it. >>As I said - I don't believe so. I personally (and you should know >>that) dumped apt for yum some years ago which caused YellowDog to do >>the same. They apparently were of the same opinion. That yum works >>better. >>But that doesn't stop me from listening and asking when I see such >>statements. >> >> >> > >I'm trying to listen. But I've not gotten any bug reports and this is >the first I've heard of it. > >so if you can't tell me what the bug looks like and you can't tell me >who knows about the bug what am I supposed to say? :) > > Makes two of us - I don't have any further information. My reply on the statement was just that I have a few thousand machines out there and no problems. Most of them are PPC though, but given the way yum is coded that doesn't really make a difference. But if I get any info then I will certainly pass it on. Karsten -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20050526/acf13f77/attachment.htm
