[Yum] Any way to force an "authoritative" repository?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 07:24 -0800, Alan Hagge wrote:
> Hopefully the issue with this should be obvious...I don't want to have 
> to modify (or have my less-familiar co-workers modify) and push to 100+ 
> clients a modified config file every time we override a package provided 
> by a repo with one of our own.  Also, if we add a new repo, we don't 
> want to have to comb through what it provides to check whether it's 
> providing the same things that our "custom" repo is providing in order 
> to tweak include/exclude settings.  I just want to be able to say "if 
> this repository provides a package, its version overrides all others, 
> including newer versions".
> 
> Any other options?

no, not really.

Making one repo's packages 'better' even if the packages are not higher
versions is just adding in a super-epoch. I'm not sure that's a good
move for:
 1. sanity of code
 2. sanity of users
 3. long term maintainability of depsolver.

-sv



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux