> Yum isn't a magic bullet. Are you trying to say that whilst the 'ls' and 'cd' commands are "magic bullets" because they do their jobs, yum does not? That would answer my query far more fully. This is why - in the original email - I wondered about yum without header info being needed so that I would not have to rely on a "repository" being lazy, ineffective or worse still "not a magic bullet". Thanks, TheFinn. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nigel Metheringham" <Nigel.Metheringham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Yellowdog Updater, Modified" <yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 2:02 AM Subject: Re: [Yum] hmmm my yum ate my computer. > On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 16:40, TheFinn wrote: > > I think you missed the point somehow. > > > > Please, stick your flames in your /dev/null. > > That wasn't a flame. This message is approaching flaminess. > > > I am merely commenting on the issue I originally posted. Perhaps you should > > read back... > > I have twice answered the issues raised in your original message. You > however have ignored things and just vaguely flamed the world because > you fucked over your computer. You then assert yourself to be a guru. > > Yum isn't a magic bullet and will not help those who are proud to be > stupid. > > -- > [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] > [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] > > > _______________________________________________ > Yum mailing list > Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum >
