On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:04, seth vidal wrote: > > you mean set usecomps=0, right? Otherwise you're still getting the > headers from comps. Yes, that is what I meant - 'usecomps', not 'nocomps'... just mistyped. > odd - at the point where you're segfaulting the headers have already > been HEAVILY used. > > Can you turn up the debug level and give me some more info. This is the end of the output with -d 10: ---------- Checking cached RPM subversion-0.32.1-1.i386.rpm Download start for neon.i386 localhdrpath= /var/cache/yum/fedora-base/headers/neon-0-0.24.3-1.i386.hdr for neon i386 Checking cached RPM neon-0.24.3-1.i386.rpm Creating Transaction Set localhdrpath= /var/cache/yum/fedora-base/headers/subversion-0-0.32.1-1.i386.hdr for subversion i386 localhdrpath= /var/cache/yum/fedora-base/headers/neon-0-0.24.3-1.i386.hdr for neon i386 Running test transaction: Test transaction complete, Success! localhdrpath= /var/cache/yum/fedora-base/headers/subversion-0-0.32.1-1.i386.hdr for subversion i386 localhdrpath= /var/cache/yum/fedora-base/headers/neon-0-0.24.3-1.i386.hdr for neon i386 Segmentation fault ---------- By the way, it appears that the header files are different (./subversion...hdr is downloaded from the repo, /root/hdlist-hdrs/subversion...hdr is generated from the hdlist): # diff subversion-0-0.32.1-1.i386.hdr /root/hdlist-hdrs/subversion-0-0.32.1-1.i386.hdr Binary files subversion-0-0.32.1-1.i386.hdr and /root/hdlist-hdrs/subversion-0-0.32.1-1.i386.hdr differ > > I tested this on fc1 and fc2 and it worked fine for installs for both. This is on an FC1 machine. Have you tried installing something from the base distro which does not have an update (ie. something where the only header it has is from the hdlist)? -Jeff
