[Yum] Re: yum update problem with biarch (i686/x86_64)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 14:26 -0500, Christopher Allen Wing wrote:
> I found the problem. I had omitted the line:
> 
> 	exactarch=1
> 
> from the yum.conf file. yum was therefore using the default setting (0)
> for this.
> 
> When I add 'exactarch=1' to the config file, then yum works as expected.
> >From the documentation it wasn't quite clear to me what effect this
> setting would have, so I left it unspecified. Now I see that it changes the
> behavior of multi-arch upgrades.
> 
> 
> I will have to send a longer email to the list at some point to describe
> what we do with yum. We use it as part of a larger configuration
> management system and dynamically generate the yum.conf file along with
> other things. We're probably abusing it in some ways but it has been a
> great tool for us and I appreciate the work you've put in to develop it.


Now that actually makes sense for yum 2.0.X.

You might consider trying out yum 2.1.X with the new metadata and seeing
how it differs in the same situation.

-sv



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux