At 6:45 PM +0300 9/18/03, Axel Thimm wrote: >Incidentially I have been pushed to support even 7.3 and have been >preparing rpm 4.2 and yum 2.0.3 for all three platforms. I have built >rpms, but I haven't set up systems < RH9 to test them yet. Any takers? Why is the yum version number different? yum's site number is 1.x.x, yours is 2.x.x. Don't understand this at all. I use 8.0 at home and 9.0 at work. I'd be happy to test if I knew what that involves. Are failures made obvious in some way? >The descriptions are on the repo site itself, as a colored legend on >every page on the bottom. The ones looking dangerous are intended to >look like that ;) The problem is there's no link (or better, a copy) of this text on the yum repository page. The problem would vanish if your text were to be copied there, or at least a clickable link to this text. -- Brad J. Cox, PhD, 703 361 4751, http://virtualschool.edu http://virtualschool.edu/mybank Digital Rights Management System http://virtualschool.edu/jco Java Cryptographic Objects (JCO) http://virtualschool.edu/jwaa Java Web Application Architecture (JWAA) http://virtualschool.edu/java+ Java Preprocessor (Java+)
