On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 19:03, Brad Cox wrote: > Thanks for the quick response. I think I'm back together. Went to > atrpms, under RH8.0, found yum but with a much larger version number > (yum 2.0.2-1.fr.at to be precise). Used rpm to install that and it > seemed to work. I've no idea why the version number is so large. > > While you're fixing that bad link, could you add some text to the > repositories page explaining what all those links are for? Needn't be > elaborate, anything's better than leaving it to people to guess which > ones are safe and which not. Well that's just it - I can't list the ones I think are safe or not, or I'd list EXTREMELY few :) It's up to the user to decide what they think is safe. -sv
